| Author |
Message |
|
The Lorro
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:26 am |
|
 |
| Group N |
 |
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 9:49 am
Posts: 188
Location: Fife
Car Model: ST205
|
|
When my ST205 was last used regularly (sniff) it consistently gave 22mpg over each fill. I sometimes started off with good intentions but ended up blatting it as the figure only really improved slightly when I was frugal.
_________________ 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
cms-gt4
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:27 am |
|
|
| Junior WRC |
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 8:06 pm
Posts: 595
Location: Knoxville, TN USA
Car Model: None
|
|
Could someone verify what RON JDM 205 was tuned for? I have head 98 and 100, but I would like to find out for sure in case I need to boost my octane.
_________________ Coldiron (Cold - Iron) 1992 Celica Gt4 RC Conv. St205 swap  http://www.noritoy.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
darrylp
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:44 am |
|
|
| Group N |
 |
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:22 am
Posts: 235
Location: Central Dorset
Car Model: None
|
|
I'd always heard 100 Ron, but don't forget Ron and Mon are different.
The 185 edu has good knock regard response. And the 205 jdm and UK exists never show any consistent power figures when swapped on the same car on the same day when on a dump. So I'd say both are using knock control to run the timing / fuelling. Thus implying better fuel with give better mpg & power if driven lightly.
Darryl
_________________
--
Darryl
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
