www.gt4dc.co.uk
Maintain, Modify and DRIVE your GT-Four


It is currently Wed Oct 08, 2025 7:26 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:46 pm
Posts: 9
Car Model: None
Folks,

I've tried doing a little research on this to no avail :(.

Regarding the wear points on the Super Strut equipped ST205s... Has anyone replaced the likes of the figure 8s with rose jointed equivalents?

This may not be ideal on a daily driven car... potentially a little harsh.

However the advantages of a more robust suspension link, reduced wear and tear, offering a tighter link in a large chain all may help?

Any thoughts?

Neil


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
I can't imagine any way of doing this apart from getting completely new arms fabricated at which point you may as well go McPherson and avoid the problem altogether (although this will be expensive :( )

Everything that wears on the OEM setup is
a) already a spherical/cup and ball bearing
b) built into the existing cast components

Figure 8 links aren't the expensive bit to replace (although they're not cheap at ~£100 eack) it's the arms they bolt too that usually fail at around the same time.

People have looked into rebuildable versions for many years but afaik no such thing exists yet


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:46 pm
Posts: 9
Car Model: None
Thanks for the reply.

What about replacing them with something lighter, stronger, redesigned.

I should have been clearer, I mean replacing some of the cast arms etc with a new rose jointed arm. Not just the joint itself.

Probably expensive enough though. Maybe a worth while solution.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:40 pm 
Offline
Group B
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:13 pm
Posts: 3685
Location: Bournemouth
Car Model: None
The advantage of the initial cost of fabrication is that it could use replacable wear parts.
I suspect cost would be such that you'd need to do an awful lot of miles / several joint changes to break even.
Advatage of OEM is that the arm never gets old enough to risk suffering metal fatigue.

Another aspect is the consequence of an arm snapping is likely a BAD accident, and liability would rest with the designer and the person who decided to fit a non standard part with no proven history.

_________________
If at first you don't suck seed, try drier grain.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:08 pm 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:46 pm
Posts: 9
Car Model: None
You make a good point on the safety aspect, one I hadn't thought of.

I was more looking at the advantage being a harsher but sharper ride..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:17 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:14 am
Posts: 3267
Location: Camberley, Surrey
Car Model: ST205
My limited experience with Rose joints is that they wear fairly quickly unless you properly protect them which can be easier said than done.

My westfield had some worn joints after only about 10k miles of use.

_________________
GT4DC Events Co-ordinator
1996 ST205 UK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:22 pm 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:46 pm
Posts: 9
Car Model: None
Oh dear, my limited experience of them is showing.

Perhaps not ideal for anything but a dedicated track car?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:22 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
kind of true but

even if they do wear quickly they are cheapish to replace.Probably not cost effective on a fig8 link where you're looking at two every 10k miles vs a genuine fig8 every 80k or so but likely cheaper on the lower arm with only one

he whole lot would be better swapped to something different long term but that requires new front shocks and hubs which in turn means doing something with the brakes and so it goes on!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:58 pm 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:46 pm
Posts: 9
Car Model: None
Just space frame the chassis sure too! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:16 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 3486
Location: On Top
Car Model: None
The chassis will be twisted by now anyway so spaceframing is your best option ;-)

_________________
JP
GT4DC Treasurer

Grey St185 RC
Silver BMW E46 M3
Multicolour yawn Honda VFR400
Silver Honda Civic Type-R


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group