www.gt4dc.co.uk
Maintain, Modify and DRIVE your GT-Four


It is currently Mon Oct 06, 2025 7:26 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:58 am 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 3486
Location: On Top
Car Model: None
Wondering if anyone has any advice on standard alignment settings for the Gt-Four which suit track work. Any advice on how to get the Four to handle on track would be much appreciated rather than just relying on mechanical grip as we seem to do.

In essence I cant help but feel that the Four in standard or mildly modded form does not feel balanced on track - the usual heavy use of front tyres and understeer is getting a little tedious. I would like to alleviate the problem rather than just going for track rubber to increase mechanical grip - the limits will still be met with more serious consequences.

I have been reading a little and have been advised to raise ride height (and hence rollcentre) on flowing/undulating circuits to endeavour to transfer more load to outside tyres.

Any advice appreciated :-)

_________________
JP
GT4DC Treasurer

Grey St185 RC
Silver BMW E46 M3
Multicolour yawn Honda VFR400
Silver Honda Civic Type-R


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ST185 Handling
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:05 am 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:53 pm
Posts: 1736
Location: Another Shire County
Car Model: ST185
Hey JP,
In response to your question and after our discussion last night, here's the link I was talking about:
http://www.whiteline.com.au/articles/RH ... aGT4_a.htm
Pretty much answers your questions I think.

I've gone for Whiteline strut tower braces front and back, Whiteline 20mm rear roll/sway bar, new Toyota drop links front and back, Whiteline camber bolts, TEIN Super Street Coilover Suspension with upper mounts + the EDFC kit and a Fensport Polyurethane Bushes Handling kit. I've also managed to pick up some Polyurethane engine mount bushes.
Anyway, match this up with a set of 18 x 8 alloy wheels shod with something like Toyo Proxes and I reckon you'll have something that will handle superbly.
Watch this space :D

_________________
Vice Chairman
1990 White UK Celica ST185 - Project DTM
1997 Cream BMW R1200C (as seen in James Bond "Tomorrow Never Dies")
2005 Jaguar X-type 3.0 Sovereign AWD Automatic
Blood Bikes - https://www.freewheelers.org.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:17 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
DJ posted my settings over on the OC ages ago. I can't remember if I've ever posted them here


As we discussed last night I also don't think that concrete dampers are the way forward. I suspect the car needs more ARB support to counteract bodyroll instead of winding up damper settings which seems to make the car a little skittish. I'd go with uprated front ARBs possibly with adjustable droplinks although these are not essential

I have stock settings for camber and caster (no adjustable topmounts here :( ) with a 0 toe setup to give neutral turn in and understeer. I suspect some monkying with negative toe would help solve the issue of understeer and camber adjustment is going to make a difference too. Basically it needs a proper adjustable setup and then some dedicated track time to do back to back comparisons with different setups.
Suspension tuning is a dashed long winded process


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:56 pm 
Offline
Junior WRC
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 701
Car Model: None
for circuit setup, you need a balance of the following:
toe, camber,caster, roll, arb, springage, compression & rebound..

tyre choice & pressure is also very important..

as to achieve a setup that works, requires telemetry data, feel..each track requires adjustments.

road setup is no use for a race track setup, even trackdays .


choice of components used is key ....often overlooked

_________________
Black UK 96 205 shed with heater full on telemetry.

project six million dollar 185, faster, stronger, lighter than before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:17 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:06 am
Posts: 4743
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Car Model: ST205
I'd concur with Steve. Even with the TRD springs and 4-way dampers plus Whiteline ARB on stiffest setting theres still too much roll. The Pilbeam ARB's on the Elise are almost twice the diameter of the stock bar and this is to control roll on a 700kg car. With almost twice the weight in the Four you can imagine what's required to control roll.

I'd be really interested to experience Kris or Looseys ST205 TEIN/EDFC setup on track ....... hint hint!

_________________
Don
GT4DC Chairman
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205WRC JDM 269bhp @ 0.9bar
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four Special GT 590bhp @ 1.8bar
1989 Van Diemen RF88/89 Formula Ford 1600
2008 Nissan Patrol GU 3.0L ZD30DDTi 154bhp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:52 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:07 pm
Posts: 988
Location: Fareham
Car Model: ST205
lol at Don!

Do you think you could handle a totally stock car on track these days bearing in mind you'd have no guages or star trek heads up displays to distract you from the wildlife passing you by!!??!!

_________________
Loosey
Loosey@gt4dc.co.uk
Storm Blue JDM ST205
Super White JDM ST205
http://www.gtfours.co.uk

Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but they make you smile when you shove them down the stairs!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:07 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:06 am
Posts: 4743
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Car Model: ST205
Well I've been driving a 'totally stock' Snow White for a year now so I'm nicely acclimatised :wink: Track day/evening coming up soon too :D

_________________
Don
GT4DC Chairman
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205WRC JDM 269bhp @ 0.9bar
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four Special GT 590bhp @ 1.8bar
1989 Van Diemen RF88/89 Formula Ford 1600
2008 Nissan Patrol GU 3.0L ZD30DDTi 154bhp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:12 am 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:07 pm
Posts: 988
Location: Fareham
Car Model: ST205
When and where?

_________________
Loosey
Loosey@gt4dc.co.uk
Storm Blue JDM ST205
Super White JDM ST205
http://www.gtfours.co.uk

Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but they make you smile when you shove them down the stairs!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:01 pm 
Offline
Junior WRC
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 701
Car Model: None
spring rates before arb rate...:wink:

straight arb is more productive than one that has half dozen bends...:lol:

Don you must have a fat 4, if its double your lotus. 1400kg..:lol: most rear arb run hollow straight ones, well ones that work, not solid bar..hence why such diameter..

_________________
Black UK 96 205 shed with heater full on telemetry.

project six million dollar 185, faster, stronger, lighter than before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:55 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
Datajon wrote:
Don you must have a fat 4, if its double your lotus. 1400kg


Erm, do you remember having mine on the scales lol
1400Kg is lightweight in comparison :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:04 pm 
Offline
Junior WRC
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 701
Car Model: None
yes Steve, the scales never recovered... was one of the heavier breed of wagon's i have weighed...:lol:

not all faffs are fat, some or more slender than others. but they all handle the same.... :wink: tame :lol:

_________________
Black UK 96 205 shed with heater full on telemetry.

project six million dollar 185, faster, stronger, lighter than before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:28 pm 
Offline
Junior WRC
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 701
Car Model: None
On a more serious note, I would suggest relocating the rear arb to the rear side of the rear diff, being that the sub frame is situated there too, would be a dandy place to run a STRAIGHT anti roll bar, more than enough room. Least then you can hook it up next to the hub, not the suspension tube body..

_________________
Black UK 96 205 shed with heater full on telemetry.

project six million dollar 185, faster, stronger, lighter than before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Interesting topic...
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:26 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:53 pm
Posts: 1736
Location: Another Shire County
Car Model: ST185
I have just received the last of the list of my suspension parts. :D
Will be looking at fitting during May (on holiday for a couple of weeks).

One thing I know for sure is that it isn't going to be straight forward... different conditions warrant different setups. :?
Guess I'll be doing some R&D on the subject.

_________________
Vice Chairman
1990 White UK Celica ST185 - Project DTM
1997 Cream BMW R1200C (as seen in James Bond "Tomorrow Never Dies")
2005 Jaguar X-type 3.0 Sovereign AWD Automatic
Blood Bikes - https://www.freewheelers.org.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:42 am 
Offline
Junior WRC
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 701
Car Model: None
i do find it amusing what people have to say about suspension improvements, yet have no first hand experience in the setting up..anything in there life.

having spent some time in club level motorsport, setting various types of cars its not an easy task, unless you have all equipment to hand you will be fighting a loosing battle.

people's first advice, tends to lead towards white line arb, nice that will sort it, what about all the other more important stuff..


my list of todo's .

check & if required replace all suspension bushes thoughout

spring rates to suite suspension setup and function, many sets required.

full adjustable compression & rebound dampers

spherical top mounts

reinforced suspension pickup points, inner wings, etc

roll cage, as the body will be flexing....


as for different setups, yes this is true, but unless you'll racing at a competitive level its pointless, you need full telemetry, driver commitment, this takes time.

i made adjustment to the 185ratter every other day, changing springs,geometry unitl got something that offered a good level of improvement, changes towards level of g force under cornering, thats the important stuff.

_________________
Black UK 96 205 shed with heater full on telemetry.

project six million dollar 185, faster, stronger, lighter than before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:27 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
I believe it's mostly a bang per buck think though Jon

Most people are not after the last 0.01g of corner force

What they want is something cheap and easy giving massive improvement for minimal outlay.

Then, for the 205 at least, there's the issue of lack of choice. There simply aren't off the shelf parts out there that allow the real level of tweaking required.

Look at my old mini for eg. That had adjustable everything and it all came off the shelf. Rosejointed, coilovered etc etc you can just go to miniworld (for eg) with circa 500 notes and walk out with a completely adjustable setup
Certainly on the 205 there's no option to do that at so you end up looking at customized builds which is going to cost a fortune
Unless you happen to be, well, you lol, with a nicely setup experimentation workshop to convert stock parts into bespoke you have to get someone unfamiliar with the car to build parts with unpredictable results.
Sure you can go to Leda etc etc and they will build you a nice set of adjustable struts. But they will also be in the dark regards spring rates, damping rates etc etc and getting this right is going to needs loads of trial and terror. As you know you can get into the ballpark with book numbers but gitting it right is a matter of carefully controlled experimentation. Very time consuming and more potential outlay on new springs, dampers etc etc.
Then there's the kit required. Ideally corner scales are going to be needed for setting ride height, adjusting for driver weight etc etc.
A 4wheel alignment is really necessary multiple times for a given damper setup to tweak max performance

It can mostly be done "on the cheap" but it takes huge time and effort and you still need several accurate sessions on a proper alignment setup to perfect it.
I used to have all sorts of jigs for basic mini tweaking. I had gurtmongous poles which bolted to the hubs allowing accurate setting of toe. You could work out thrust angle too. Then there was the camber gauges. Accurate setting of this was really only possible because we had a scissor ramp back then giving guaranteed points of reference, especially combined with the tailor made car cradle which bolted to it. I never ever figured out a way to reliably DIY caster though. Sure it could be done :(
I'd set up the suspension to something that seemed about right then dial in the geometry. Then go out and drive it, usually with horrible results. Then come back and bin all the "think it should be right settings" and start again until I had the damping set up about right feeling. Then began all of the the geometry tuning with that damper setup. It took weeks and weeks of widdling about to get anything close to an ideal feeling setup. If I had G sensing logging you could probably have multiplied that even further since (from my experience) the absolute optimum paper setup rarely seems to suit an individual driving style. For eg I tend to go a little understeery so I enter slow but tend to come out fast etc etc etc etc. Everyone else wants a slightly different feel from their car which suits them
Once I'd got all that set up "just so" I'd still always have to go back to the tyre shop for a 4wheel alignment, corner weighting etc etc to actually make everything perfect.
I was lucky in that they "sponsored" me with free access to their kit otherwise it would have cost me hugely
All of the above also excludes simple settings like tyre compunds, pressures which only serve to make setup issues worse lol

And all of that is in a lightweight car that intrinsicly handles better than the 4 and about which there is a huge wealth of setup info to get you started. It just gets worse when you throw a hugely nose heavy naturally understeery 4WD package into the mix :(

Plus I must confess I make assumptions that probably aren't right. I tend to expect that people have checked the basics and upgraded the basics before they start asking questions simply because that's what I would do.

Bearing all that in mind I think it's quite possible to suggest a setup for "average Joe" based on what's available and based on the goal.

For eg, JP wants a nice trackday setup which works on the road too and which largely comes out of a "handling improvements" tin
The choices are quite simple. TRD springs and dampers, whiteline adjustable rear ARB and a good check of all the suspension linkages to eliminate any play. Then throw an average alignment into the mix and you're going to have a car that handles much better than stock for minimum (lolololololol) outlay. For a slightly more adjustable setup then go with the Tein coilovers

Jon wants something which might possible be competetive in a race series. Clearly the above JP setup will work but won't be ultimate. You're going to be looking for more spring choices, wider damping ranges, more geometry adjustment etc etc
A proper adjustable coilover setup is really the only way forward to allow proper corner weighting, height adjustment etc etc. Youre going to want either re-valvable dampers or more ideally fully adjustable remote resevoir jobs mated to superstrut casings
Full geometry adjustment will be needed either through bespoke suspension arms or at least adjustable topmounts and/or camber bolts (yuk)
At this point track rubber means you'll be needing to strenthen/de flex all of the stock bushed to remove unwanted geometry changes due to mountings.
You'll end up with a car that handles beautifully (within the intrinsic chassis limits) on track but is a right pain in the proverbial on the potholed barely maintained surfaces that are the UK roads


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group